Source: DaoShuoBlockchain
In the past two days, a MEME coin GOAT, which is said to be closely related to AI, has risen rapidly, and its market value has reached 150 million US dollars in four days.
The earliest information on the Internet said that this token was issued by AI, but later confirmed information said that this token was not issued by AI, but AI robots were deeply involved in the dissemination and promotion.
The Twitter account of this AI robot involved in the dissemination and promotion is "terminal of truths@truth_terminal". It is reported that all activities of this account are initiated by AI robots, and only two types of activities are intervened by humans:
- What kind of posts can be sent
- What kind of accounts can interact
The creator of this Twitter account is Andy Ayrey. Andy Ayrey expressed strong excitement about the takeoff of this MEME coin. He believes that this is not a crypto project, but a proof of the infinite creativity contained in the big model.
Earlier, I wrote an article introducing the Coinbase team's use of AI to trade a crypto asset, which opened the precedent for AI to trade.
Now this case has opened the precedent for AI to render emotions and promote projects.
I believe that it will not be long before all kinds of activities currently carried out by human society will be imitated and successfully realized by AI. In the future, AI will be able to issue coins, post, follow accounts, promote projects, and trade by itself...
One day, AIs will form their own crypto ecology and participate in various activities in the crypto field on an equal footing with humans.
I carefully looked at the posts on this account. From the format, frequency and content, it seems a bit dull (for example, there are almost no emoticons), which is quite different from human behavior patterns.
But I calmed down and thought again: Isn't this considering the problem from our human perspective? If the readers of these posts are not humans but AI, how do we know that AI readers will find these posts dull? Will AI readers think that this style of post is more in line with its appetite?
Furthermore, if the target of the crypto project promotion is AI in the future, what will happen?
The takeoff of this project has also triggered heated discussions on another topic:
If the initiator of the project is AI instead of human, then no matter what problems the project has in the end, the culprit has nothing to do with humans. Wouldn't this perfectly circumvent the jurisdiction of US regulators?
Does this mean that American players can freely participate in such projects?
By analogy, does this pose another big problem for all regulators around the world?
So I guess that in the future, encryption projects actively initiated and deeply participated by AI are likely to have an unexpected and unimaginable strong attraction to humans.
The more I think about this, the more interesting it becomes.
In addition, there is another detail in this incident that is worth noting:
That is, A16Z funded this AI robot, especially the innovation and exploration of this robot in a series of behaviors.
I have always paid close attention to A16Z because its ideas are very bold and novel.
Although I am cautious about many of the crypto projects it has invested in, it dares to invest in some funds that dare not invest in, especially some projects that it does not understand.
There is a strong tolerance for innovation in its thinking.
I am deeply impressed by it and have also shared a sentence in online exchanges: In the face of innovation, innovation is more important than correctness.
This way of thinking that dares to temporarily ignore the real value and dares to be unrestrained is very worthy of our reference and reference.