Crypto exchange Coinbase just scored a partial victory this week in its ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, led by Judge Katherine Failla, has granted Coinbase’s motion to force the SEC to spit out documents on the agency's classification of crypto tokens as securities, according to a Sept. 5 court filing.
Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, highlighted the importance of this development in an X post, stating that the court order will force the SEC to produce “important discovery” in the case.
This legal dispute dates back to June last year, when the SEC filed an enforcement action against Coinbase, accusing the company of violating securities laws by operating as an unregistered exchange, broker, and clearing agency. In response, Coinbase filed a motion in July to compel the SEC to provide documents related to its application of securities laws to digital assets, including how the Howey Test is applied to crypto tokens.
Coinbase also sought records on the SEC’s deliberations during the company’s initial public offering (IPO) and statements from SEC Chair Gary Gensler about crypto.
In August, the SEC rejected Coinbase’s requests, stating that the request was overly broad and irrelevant to the case. But it seems the court’s ultimate decision to side with Coinbase seems to imply otherwise. This decision could pave the way for further legal challenges, not just for Coinbase but also for other crypto firms facing similar regulatory scrutiny.
Judge Limits Coinbase's Subpoena Scope
In June, Coinbase issued a subpoena to SEC Chair Gary Gensler, seeking his private emails dating back to 2017, which the exchange argued were key to the case. Coinbase later scaled back the request to include only documents from Gensler’s tenure as SEC Chair, abandoning its pursuit of his personal communications after the SEC swore under penalty of perjury that Gensler never used personal channels for SEC business.
Coinbase also requested that the SEC conduct a preliminary search of non-enforcement files to counter the agency's claims of undue burden.
This request was originally directed at top SEC leadership as well as currency and former SEC commissioners, but it was later reduced to just five staff members. However, Judge Failla did not concede to Coinbase’s request to the fullest. For example, she has allowed the SEC to exclude current and former SEC commissioners from the search list and allowed the SEC to keep certain redacted documents sealed.
An anonymous source even revealed to media outlets that the SEC was only ordered to provide internal documents containing external attachments.
Still, Grewal sees this as a step forward for the case, stating:
“While it may be the case that we withdrew one particular request and the judge recognised certain reasonable limits, this was an order granting the heart of the discovery that we have been seeking for months.”
Judge Failla’s order coincided with another federal ruling allowing a class-action lawsuit against Coinbase to proceed. The lawsuit claims that Coinbase downplayed the risks associated with its legal battle with the SEC to its users.
SEC under Scrutiny
Meanwhile, the SEC has been facing growing criticism due to its regulation-by-enforcement approach to the crypto industry.
Critics are pointing towards the fact that the SEC is pursuing legal actions against key industry players when the SEC has failed to provide a clear established regulatory framework for companies to follow in the first place.
Led by Iowa’s Attorney General Brenna Bird, seven U.S states have come together to challenge the SEC regulation on cryptocurrency. The states have filed an amicus brief arguing that the SEC’s attempt to regulate cryptocurrencies constitute a “power grab” that would stifle innovation, harm the crypto industry, and exceed the agency’s authority.
The coalition includes Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska and Oklahoma.
A case that could impact future crypto space
While this is just a small victory for Coinbase, this would be a case that crypto fans would be staying tuned to because of the implication that case could have on the future of the cryptocurrency industry.
I would even dare to say that the outcome will likely influence how regulators and investors view crypto assets and their potential regulation.