Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, frowns deeply on the possibility of Ethereum censorship by the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). He maintained that such an action amounts to an attack on the network. Hence, it could bring results in different dimensions.
Buterin disclosed his stance concerning this in a tweet. He mentioned that he voted for burning the ETH stake through social consensus in a Twitter poll by Eric Wall.
There are several reactions to OFAC’s forced censorship of Tornado Cash, a crypto mixer. First, many are expressing concerns about a potential Ethereum censorship after its transition.
Though with the Merge, the blockchain would gain more validators from the Beacon chain. However, data from a dune dashboard revealed that more than 66% of the Beacon chain validators would stick to OFAC action.
Besides getting compliance from validators, there are other aspects of considerations to make with potential censorship. First, there’s the area of most staking providers like Coinbase, Lido, Staked, Bitcoin Suisse, and Kraken Exchange that may comply with the OFAC’s censorship and regulation against Ethereum.
Question for the Ethereum community. If a majority of stake chooses A in this poll, will you:
X) Consider the censorship an attack on Ethereum and burn their stake via social consensus
Y) Tolerate the censorship https://t.co/Mf48co37jK— Erica Wall X 🏴 (@ercwl) August 15, 2022
Hence, what would be the reaction of the Ethereum community? Will they accept and adhere to the censorship or tag the action as an attack on the Ethereum blockchain?
In a broader view, many believe Ethereum is more susceptible to forced regulations and censorship. This stance would become more significant after the blockchain transitions from Proof-of-Work (PoW) to Proof-of-Stake (PoS).
From a positive stance, up to 62% of Ethereum users buy the opinion of burning ETH stakes of providers once they decide to censor transactions. The option aligns with that of Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum. He had chosen the burning of the staked tokens.
The community would play actively to get a strong counter stance to a potential network censor. Its pushbacks against regulators’ forced actions could facilitate the primary foundation that forms the concept of cryptocurrency.
For example, some people already consider unstaking their ETH tokens off centralized exchanges. They know that these exchanges would invariably comply with regulators’ censorships.
The decentralized finance ecosystem is at risk with increasing enforcement from governments and regulators. Hitting hard on open-source technology and developers distorts the basis of decentralization.
Potential targets are different DeFi assets, applications, and projects such as smart contracts, protocols, stablecoins, DAOs, and firms.
Besides centralized exchanges, some decentralized protocols comply with the OFAC’s sanctions and censorships. For example, Aave, Circle, Alchemy, dYdX, Infura, Balancer, and Uniswap have blocked all addresses connected to Tornado Cash. Also, they blocked addresses under the sanction of the OFAC.
Featured image from Pixabay, Chart from TradingView.com
Addressing the community's view that "Ethereum currently lacks a clear overall development direction," Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin responded yesterday and also expressed his strong dissatisfaction with the recent celebrity coin experiments.
MiyukiMass adoption in the cryptocurrency field has long been a narrative troubling the market. Many applications lose users due to the collapse of their economic models after achieving mass adoption. This article uses UXLINK and NOTCOIN as case studies to analyze the requirements that today's popular social projects need to meet.
WeiliangA $10 billion lawsuit in the UK Court of Appeal pits Bitcoin SV (BSV) holders against major exchanges, alleging collusion and missed fortunes following BSV's delisting in 2019. The case, involving six defendants and a complex legal battle, could reshape how cryptocurrency exchanges operate and set precedents for future disputes.
WeatherlyThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act of South Korea will take effect on July 19. Among its provisions, one law mandates that banks entrusted by cryptocurrency exchanges must pay interest on crypto deposits. This law significantly impacts K-Bank, the digital bank entrusted by Upbit, the largest exchange in South Korea.
AlexChina has seen its first criminal case involving the issuance of virtual currency. The case has sparked controversy over whether withdrawing liquidity, resulting in trading losses, constitutes fraud.
MiyukiTelegram has introduced Telegram Stars, an in-app currency for purchasing digital goods and services within the platform, and developers can convert these Stars to TON cryptocurrency via Fragment. This system reduces commission fees, incentivizing developers to create and promote apps on Telegram, furthering its ambition to become a comprehensive super app.
WeatherlyWithin a week of its launch, Iggy Azalea's MOTHER token achieved a market cap exceeding $200M. However, the recent trend of celeb meme coin releases has drawn criticism from Vitalik Buterin. Will MOTHER’s momentum last?
CatherineJPMorgan stated in its latest report that Bitcoin mining enterprises with attractive electricity contracts might become potential acquisition targets for hyperscale data centers and artificial intelligence (AI) companies.
AlexSEC Chairman Gary Gensler said in an interview with Reuters yesterday (6th) that the official approval of an Ethereum spot ETF depends on how quickly issuers respond to SEC comments. This implies that the SEC will not delay the approval process for the S-1 filing as some fear.
MiyukiTaiwan has been criticized as a "fraud kingdom" due to rampant fraud. Some believe that Taiwan's criminal penalties for fraud are too lenient, making the cost of crime too low for fraudsters. This article compares the severity of fraud penalties in Taiwan, China, Japan, and South Korea.
Weiliang