Author: Lawyer Liu Honglin; Source: Mankiw Blockchain Legal Services
Traditional financial practitioners turn to the crypto circle
Recently, Lawyer Liu Honglin of Mankiw Law Firm found that there are many more friends in the circle of friends who have emerged from the traditional private equity and public offering industries and started to do business in the cryptocurrency circle's education and training and paid communities. The reason is not difficult to understand. For these people who have emerged from the traditional financial services industry, they found that providing investment advice and financial consulting for virtual currencies to customers is essentially no different from investment training in the traditional financial market. After all, the K-line charts, sentiment analysis, information tracking, etc. in virtual currency investment are similar to those in the traditional stock market, so the migration of investment skills seems to be a natural thing.
However, after these traditional financial practitioners entered the cryptocurrency circle, they found that it was not easy to do business with "old leeks" - after all, the resources and information accumulation of old players in the cryptocurrency circle are difficult for them to surpass. Therefore, more people began to turn their attention to the user group of Web2, using their information and skills advantages in the Web3 industry to provide virtual currency financial management training courses to these Web2 customers, with course fees starting from several thousand yuan. After completing the course, customers can also choose higher-priced services, such as joining private communities to obtain investment advice on secondary market buying and selling points and primary market potential projects. Consultants often share their "successful records" in Moments to attract more customers, but if the investment fails, some people will simply refund the money. Such a business model has become more and more common in the cryptocurrency circle.
Behind this phenomenon, although it seems to be a service innovation, it also hides potential legal risks. Below, we will analyze the legal risks behind such services and how to prevent them from the perspective of legal compliance.
Don't turn your training business into a cryptocurrency trading coach
For well-known reasons, in mainland China, virtual currency investment consulting faces far more legal challenges than the general financial industry. China has repeatedly made it clear that virtual currencies are not legally forfeitable, and has successively introduced strict supervision of virtual currency transactions. The "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Speculation in Virtual Currency Transactions" issued in 2021 completely prohibits domestic financial institutions and payment institutions from providing services for virtual currency transactions. This policy essentially restricts the legality of virtual currency investment consulting and training in China. For consultants who provide virtual currency investment consulting to clients, these policies mean that they may always face risks at the compliance level. If consultants suggest "buy or sell" virtual currencies to clients without obtaining a financial business license, or even recommend speculative projects in the primary market, they will touch the red line of China's management of financial activities. Such activities are likely to be regarded as illegal investment or fraud. Once the client suffers losses and complains, the consultant may face administrative penalties or even criminal liability. There is another situation. Many consultants in this industry operate directly as individuals to save trouble, without setting up a company at all. It is indeed convenient to operate publicity and down payments in the name of an individual, but it also reduces risk isolation. Once the client has a dispute over the investment service or results, the consultant will have to face the recovery and litigation directly in his personal capacity, without even a company as a "shield". More importantly, operating in an individual capacity may also involve the problem of illegal operation. Once it is determined to be illegal operation, the consequences are not ordinary troubles. In addition, many consultants will directly collect virtual currencies from clients, such as USDT, in order to pay less taxes or avoid fund tracking. But from the perspective of consumers, using virtual currencies such as USDT to pay also buries a lot of hidden dangers: once a dispute arises, domestic legal support is relatively limited, because USDT is not considered "money" under the existing regulatory policies in mainland China. Therefore, virtual currency payment is a matter of opinion for both parties, and consumers should pay special attention to whether they can bear such risks. Several practical legal risk control suggestions
If you want to do virtual currency investment consulting, it is recommended not to use words such as "guaranteed profit" and "stable profit" at every turn. It is better to "speak frankly" when sharing such public investment "achievements". Don't be too "hard" when posting screenshots of your earnings on your Moments. Mark "investment is risky" so that people can see it clearly and avoid disputes later. If the training fee or coaching fee is relatively high, it is recommended that both parties sign a formal contract, especially such a key clause must be written: investment advice is for reference only, and the corresponding benefits and risks are also borne by the customer. Don't fall into the "trap" of direct investment.
If some friends really intend to do this as a long-term business, then you might as well consider setting up a company. The most common way is to set up a company in Hong Kong, China, so that the education and training business can be done through the company's identity, and the compliance can be more guaranteed. However, although Hong Kong's current policy on virtual currency business is friendly, the premise is that friends must ensure that they are really doing education and training, rather than making investment advice under the banner of training, otherwise they may also touch Hong Kong's financial regulations, which are much more stringent than those in mainland China.
As for the usual private domain community and course delivery, direct "calling orders" is basically not done if it can be avoided. The community allows it to play the role of sharing and communication, providing information and market dynamics. The same applies to courses. Try not to directly ask "how much this coin can rise" or "when to buy it", but talk about the use of tools and market analysis, so that you will not be caught in the "weakness". Let customers understand that you are providing knowledge, not directly giving "financial advice", so that everyone knows what is going on, and the compliance risk will be much smaller. Through these pragmatic risk control strategies, you can not only protect yourself and avoid legal risks, but also make customers more trusting and confident in the service. Although making money is fun for a while, it is really fun to ensure that you can make money all the time.