Author: Vitalik Buterin, Translator: Kurt Pan, XPTY
This article assumes that you are familiar with the basics of how SNARK and STARK work; if you are not familiar, it is recommended to read the first few sections of this article. Special thanks to Eli ben-Sasson, Shahar Papini, Avihu Levy, and others at starkware for their feedback and discussions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5da6b/5da6b1e3a68ee839a37d778aa62689f2655559b5" alt="7264982 giqIX8UuFUqyU3HXmIvy9aaDXDvKNHvsqRGecqtz.jpeg"
This transformation This has resulted in significant improvements in proof speed, most notably Starkware's ability to prove 620,000 Poseidon2 hashes per second on an M3 laptop. Specifically this means that as long as we are willing to trust Poseidon2 as part of the hash function, one of the most difficult parts of building an efficient ZK-EVM has been efficiently solved. But how do these techniques work, and how are cryptographic proofs (which often require large integers for security) built on these domains? And how do these protocols compare to more exotic constructs like Binius? This article will explore some of the subtle differences, focusing specifically on a construct called Circle STARKs (implemented in Starkware's stwo, Polygon's plonky3, and my own python implementation), which have some unique properties designed to Compatible with the efficient Mersenne31 domain.
https://x.com/StarkWareLtd/status/1807776563188162562
< /li>https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2022/08/04/zkevm.html
https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/04/29/binius.html
https://www.irreducible.com/posts/binius-hardware-optimized-snark
https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/278
https://github.com/starkware-libs /stwo
https://github.com/Plonky3/Plonky3
https://github.com/ethereum/research/tree/master/circlestark
Common problems in small domains h2>
One of the most important "tricks" when doing hash-based proofs (or indeed any kind of proof) is to prove something about the evaluation of the polynomial at random points instead of proving something about the underlying polynomial .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fa57/5fa572cd863269ade57e18e2d66aecc162109b31" alt="7264983 22Pdm7ojogM7y6EZypFVlB4Ed24IMox5jwVa9kTx.jpeg"
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat%E2%80%93Shamir_heuristic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22d79/22d793c89f48c10352f6b924ef95438c384aa7d2" alt="7264985 C39mSPmU1YhvjPunuWCvGHCNQzwIJmfNmDn2x2xX.jpeg"
There are two natural solutions to this problem:
- Execute Multiple random tests
< /p>
- https://www2.clarku.edu/faculty/djoyce/complex/mult.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85492/8549249f64d88e43abe3a2776e75dde3467dd0be" alt="7264987 QZCW0qqJNHxNLSDJtNVi1oNWfah5xjg0Hl6uQlOl.jpeg"
The implementation here is not optimal (it can be optimized with Karatsuba), it just shows the principle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f41/08f4115141b6fc09283da96dae116b2fea07c393" alt="7264988 2VOeixaBMRCtV0lPPmjUSL34lqVy646AfWJZp6wu.jpeg"
< h2>Regular FRI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5877/a5877d820dea273ea113d7bf20e3c3f0ebe0cbfd" alt="7264989 KBvcw3mvmnkBYiLa1N3iF5yJFVEVa70PkVz1CuD8. jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a750/4a750c0e44cce0c78aa5088a68312aad699c1451" alt="7264990 bQAQExIgHCyFYU46QnVMcec3GHvIlFKBIn2fwPwz.jpeg"
- https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report /2017/134/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeba6/eeba6034f4852aa964d6539a9066ee4abc4892da" alt="7264991 ERXuS4o5DYC95kgPjNMLwQ1VTz4G4utaa4vvw1ad.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2752/f2752cf4bd13f75a6d4afeb7b7350c2c85cd85d6" alt="7264992 bsGug3hbRcBmShajmubWet9ecabJeGdO4sQRKUIz.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/010f2/010f2637ab0449b983582812dc797b14b8d6b92b" alt="7264993 Wb5YPYP9rp1J539jIdtNfQwuEnVG3fbgipZpcz1L.jpeg"
Circle FRI
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a5d/d3a5df0ba1e62c77c98ff53f14505c3ec9f306f3" alt="7264994 S43sv2DxzxdKYK6gQjiyQrBVgtC0u8gp8rBxkvtM.jpeg"
- https://elibensasson.blog/why-im-excited-by-circle-stark-and-stwo/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9b46/c9b46336ce6e038d1195ce30fd27d97d06244d5f" alt="7264995 ccF23egAiMFfpps9nFr7NGQywjqxefHPmWSgaAOS.jpeg"
These Dots follow the law of addition, and if you've studied trigonometry or complex multiplication recently, you may find this law familiar:
- https://unacademy.com/content/cbse-class-11/study -material/mathematics/algebra-of-complex-numbers-multiplication/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ba2f/8ba2f77e7e34137dd28bd7a3842776438b0dc0fd" alt="7264996 TYjYFxfPg3r9wKhBRgiVNMNuPLOD3BNTS4Nyf6vw.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee093/ee093a0d44707a830db7843bb781b33dc35c9584" alt="7264997 Nh8fHBc0MtlhwVO1zRzeuzCdVBnnCv2WudeXAwij.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42323/423236438c3ea170d02b43ac76033a8827c9cfee" alt="7264998 8Z1221Wy7JAkB6TWkiIqcGORNDrrCiFb0EJltQ9B.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcdd8/dcdd83363725d7be9ed465960d1832244544290d" alt="7264999 4C0w4awnAjAE8C5jETzsz8VMO9doQbzkqsVdFS3P.jpeg"
From the second round onwards, the mapping changes:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b123d/b123d1eca6316292ab571b3d1ac3a23702a2e1f8" alt="7265000 ogolQ6CGTiMUO4fJyzTe699RKMKh3aKgHyT240AI.jpeg"
Circle FFTs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6fa4/e6fa4ca8a4e709077025472dca7a496997d1de0e" alt="7265001 QgGN1DslO7dZcfj0aj5PJLoRJOr84i3NoiArOYOB.jpeg"
- https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2019/05/12/fft.html< section>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd4ee/cd4ee7c05c87e72a00b217a806cab8116bc9dc9f" alt="7265002 4AHT8AW64fRSg3dgGp3s1F1RmGniAqRdwhI2OB6Q.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff109/ff109c73cd5b453e31a72fb66815d9a74ce6a2b9" alt="7265005 uc2SZrplWZuMPLNi0MUghNKQcviNf1R5ztiRBbmH.jpeg"
- https:/ /www.researchgate.net/publication/353344649_Elliptic_Curve_Fast_Fourier_Transform_ECFFT_Part_I_Fast_Polynomial_Algorithms_over_all_Finite_Fields
From here, let’s get into some more esoteric details, for those who implement circle STARK, vs. conventional These details will be different compared to STARK.
Get business
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecec8/ecec83041d9cdc72c9fb9cb5ce764450c9caa32f" alt="7265007 Zak5MHgMCTwfGXMAt8dxZNSZU0F1jeQMLhuQuNP2.jpeg"
- https:/ /eprint.iacr.org/2019/336
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e62f6/e62f6127608012bc392132f14183a54aba8b4adc" alt="7265010 J9joiUxvUpj6dhXc1kglM0jGDC0yf67xRTT9MWEz.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03ea3/03ea3f75b7443f634d25bef480cf4935fa6aff93" alt="7265017 kkorpdBoM0D3nUb2Y2zKtCETAeRiTHFEZOpheeqP.jpeg"
Vanishing Polynomial
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/294c0/294c060c6c468043ef37e4b329b8b4e3078232fa" alt="7265018 YhACPhhC0Ks2eYE4x825ne3x5au9ZtfvHAVHhFrr.jpeg"
Reverse bit order
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e8e7/6e8e7fc9de602d863e40052b4f42eccb456353f2" alt="7265019 MmzKXTbgpltbginUGUPPsZ109eijiA3ggjbxbxkC.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be4e7/be4e78fa3ace88eb5e400eb29b3c7201dd284d05" alt="7265020 Hu6vQpq9c2XSD8vUz6qw1XG5SFupfGDX7hIwXJ4m.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35ffd/35ffd557eb09602f6526c2e04539d6cc7ea5c562" alt="7265021 w3sZobSlezb0TwlABSE2lMVjFUWSvzmbczdxP7db.jpeg"
Efficiency
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06080/060806da387bf3983192ab3ff565cb5203e3168c" alt="7265022 u0LqGrZTW9NrlS38z3S1FmKtLKczh2WeRx5pIwyU.jpeg"
Therefore, circle STARK is actually very close to optimal! Binius is even more powerful as it allows mixing and matching domains of different sizes, giving more efficient bit packing for everything. Binius also provides the option to perform 32-bit additions without the overhead of a lookup table. However, these gains come at the cost of (in my opinion) significantly higher theoretical complexity, whereas circle STARK (and regular STARK based on BabyBear) are conceptually quite simple.
Conclusion: What do I think about circle STARKs?
Compared with regular STARK, Circle STARK does not bring much additional complexity to developers. During the implementation process, the above three issues are basically the only differences I see compared to conventional FRI. The math behind the "polynomials" that Circle FRI operates on is quite counter-intuitive and takes a while to understand and appreciate. But it happens that this complexity is hidden so that developers don't see too much of it. The complexity of Circle mathematics is encapsulated, not systematic.
Understanding circle FRI and circle FFT is also a good intellectual approach to understanding other "exotic FFTs": the most noteworthy is a binary domain FFT, previously used in Binius and LibSTARK, as well as more bizarre constructs, such as the elliptic curve FFT, which uses several to one mappings and works well with elliptic curve point operations.
https://github.com/ethereum/research/blob/master/binius/ binary_ntt.py#L60
https://github.com/elibensasson/libSTARK
https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08473
By combining Mersenne31, BabyBear and binary domain technology such as Binius, we do feel that we are approaching the limits of STARK's "base layer" efficiency. At this point in time, I expect the frontier of STARK optimization to shift towards the most efficient arithmeticization of primitives like hash functions and signatures (and optimizing those primitives themselves for this purpose), recursive constructions to unlock more parallelization, Arithmetize virtual machines to improve developer experience, and other high-level tasks.