Elon Musk and Tesla are cleared of Dogecoin manipulation charges, what's next for Dogecoin?

Elon Musk and his electric vehicle company, Tesla, have successfully defended against a class action lawsuit that accused them of manipulating the market for Dogecoin, a popular cryptocurrency. The lawsuit, filed in 2022, was dismissed with prejudice by U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, meaning the case cannot be refiled. This ruling marks a significant legal victory for Musk and Tesla, permanently ending the claims that their actions had misled investors and caused financial harm.

Musk Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Dogecoin Market Manipulation in 'Pump and Dump' Scheme

The legal battle began when a group of investors filed a lawsuit against Musk, Tesla, and SpaceX, claiming that Musk's public statements and social media activities had artificially inflated the value of Dogecoin. The investors pointed to a series of tweets and comments made by Musk, including his joking claim of becoming Dogecoin’s CEO and his suggestion that SpaceX would send a Dogecoin to the moon. The investors alleged that these statements were part of a broader "pump and dump" scheme designed to manipulate the market, causing them to invest at inflated prices before the value of Dogecoin plummeted.

The plaintiffs argued that Musk’s influence over the cryptocurrency market, especially through his Twitter account, had led to significant financial losses for those who believed his statements were serious and factual. The lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York, with the investors seeking damages for what they described as deceptive practices.

Read more: Brazil's Supreme Court threatens to shut down X if Elon Musk doesn't comply with censorship demands within next 24 hours (Twitter)

Judge Dismisses Dogecoin Lawsuit Against Musk, Citing Lack of Evidence for Market Manipulation Claims

In his ruling, Judge Hellerstein found that Musk’s statements about Dogecoin were not intended to be taken literally and could not reasonably be considered factual claims. He described the statements as "aspirational and puffery," meaning they were exaggerated comments that are not legally binding or actionable. The judge emphasized that no reasonable investor could have relied on these statements as a basis for making investment decisions.

Furthermore, Judge Hellerstein rejected the plaintiffs’ allegations of market manipulation, stating that it was “not possible to understand” how the plaintiffs had arrived at their conclusions. He found no evidence to support the claims that Musk or Tesla had engaged in a "pump and dump" scheme, which would require proof of intentional manipulation to artificially inflate the price of Dogecoin before selling off holdings for profit. The judge also dismissed the allegations of insider trading, noting that the plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims.

Read more: Elon Musk Supports Controversial California AI Bill Despite Industry Backlash

Following the court’s decision, Dogecoin, which remains one of the top cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, saw a modest decline in its value. The cryptocurrency dropped by 1.2% over a 24-hour period, trading at around $0.1. Despite the slight decrease, Dogecoin’s market capitalization still stands at approximately $14.6 billion, underscoring its significant presence in the cryptocurrency market.