Elizabeth Warren

Elon Musk, who is currently spearheading the newly established Department of Government efficiency (DOGE), is hoping to use blockchain to enhance transparency in government spending, secure data, and streamline payments.

Elon Musk accused Senator Elizabeth Warren of backing SBF’s parents, while Warren criticised his D.O.G.E involvement, citing conflicts of interest. Musk defended D.O.G.E, arguing it could curb inflation by cutting government waste. Is this political clash necessary, or just another distraction in crypto debates?

President-elect Donald Trump announced Tuesday that Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Strive co-founder Vivek Ramaswamy will lead the newly created D.O.G.E, focused on reducing bureaucracy, cutting costs, and streamlining government operations.

National policies shape global cryptocurrency markets, with regulations driving innovation or hindering growth. At TOKEN2049 Singapore, experts discuss how different national approaches impact local dynamics, global trends, cross-border transactions, and the future of cryptocurrencies in the financial system.

The evolving landscape of crypto crime in 2024 was one of the focuses at TOKEN2049 Singapore. Although illicit activities have declined, challenges such as ransomware, scams, and sanctions evasion persist. Combating crypto crime in the future will depend on strengthening global collaboration and leveraging blockchain technology for better security and transparency.

crypto party pooper, anti-crypto liz, Gensler's puppeteer, and the list goes on...

Ripple’s $1 million donation to support John Deaton’s Senate campaign highlights the growing influence of crypto in politics, aiming to advocate for favorable policies and regulatory frameworks within the U.S. government.

Dubbing himself as a "crypto president" and criticising Democratic efforts to regulate the industry, Donald Trump vowed to reverse the anti-crypto stance of President Joe Biden and SEC Chair Gary Gensler upon re-election. But is it all just talk?

Is Gary Gensler truly acting in the best interests of investors, or is there a more sinister force at play?