Ki Young Ju, CEO of CryptoQuant, emphasized the importance of regulation in the sustainable growth of Web3 and the cryptocurrency industry. In a September 29 post on X (formerly Twitter), Ju argued that with the right regulatory framework, the crypto and Web3 ecosystems could "thrive responsibly" by reducing scams and fostering trust.
Ju's remarks sparked a debate within the crypto community, with varying opinions on the role of regulation in the space, especially with that line talking about government getting its hand on crypto.
Web3’s Potential and the Need for Oversight
Ju highlighted that Web3 enables "borderless collaboration" and operates more like a protocol than a traditional corporation, signaling a fundamental shift that could impact millions of people.
He compared the future of Web3 to global tech giants, stating, “While companies like Google employ hundreds of thousands, Web3 protocols could one day involve millions."
However, Ju also acknowledged the industry's current vulnerability to scams, likening it to challenges faced by other financial sectors. He stressed the need for "smart regulation" to ensure long-term growth.
"With the right rules, Crypto and Web3 can thrive responsibly. Someday, the government will make it happen. The question is, how long will it take?” Ju remarked.
Mixed Reactions from the Crypto Community
Ju's stance on regulation prompted mixed responses from the crypto community. While some agreed that regulatory oversight is essential, others saw it as a potential threat to the industry's decentralized nature.
One user criticized the idea, arguing that regulation would diminish the substantial profits the crypto space offers, calling it a "scam."
Another user raised concerns about giving too much power to regulators, sarcastically suggesting that the community should “let someone else decide what’s best” while questioning the true purpose of decentralization.
"And of course, without massive profits, clearly none of this technology matters — because, as we all know, financial gain is the only reason to care about decentralization, privacy, and freedom, right?" the user added.
Centralization of Regulations Raises Concerns
Ju’s comments also reignited concerns about regulatory centralization, with some fearing that it could entrench monopolies and stifle competition. One user noted that humans are "fallible" and could inadvertently open the door to corruption, arguing that markets might be better off self-regulating.
Ju has also been at the center of another debate about centralization, recently claiming that China currently controls 55% of Bitcoin’s network hashrate, further fueling discussions around centralization in the crypto space.
JinseFinance
Brian
Others
Coinlive 
dailyhodl
Beincrypto
Coindesk
Cointelegraph
Bitcoinist